This article is essentially a platform for a Democratic partisan analyst's commentary rather than factual journalism. The headline describes a briefing moment as a 'plot' being 'exposed,' and centers entirely on a YouTube commentator's characterization of events as 'absolutely sickening.' No opposing perspective or factual rebuttal is provided.
Loaded LanguageAppeal to EmotionSource Selection BiasNarrative FramingAnchoring
“Donald Trump is essentially currently the President of the Gaza Strip, even though he can't even manage the United States. It is just absolutely sickening”
“A Democratic analyst was gobsmacked on Wednesday after President Donald Trump's press secretary made an 'absolutely sickening' revelation”
This opinion-inflected piece opens by declaring Leavitt's past statement 'unintentionally amusing' and frames its reporting around a predetermined conclusion that the pardon process is chaotic. While it does include a White House denial, it buries it briefly after extensive negative characterization, and the author's editorial voice is prominent throughout.
Loaded LanguageNarrative FramingSource Selection BiasAdversarial Neutrality
“I continue to believe this was one of the more unintentionally amusing things Leavitt has ever said”
“There is no process, there is no right way to do this. It's chaos”
This article combines multiple White House briefing topics to build a cumulative negative portrait of Trump, using the Jesse Jackson tribute, the Obama ape video, and Leavitt's Truth Social contradiction together. It presents Trump's Black History Month event in a dismissive tone, mocking his comments on Mike Tyson and Nicki Minaj without providing context for those appearances.
Loaded LanguageNarrative FramingSelective OmissionAppeal to Emotion
“Jackson died days after Trump doubled down on a racist video from earlier this month, depicting Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama as apes”
“He also brought several Black members of his administration on stage”
This article catalogs historical instances of Trump being called racist by Democrats and media, but does so in a way that frames all such accusations as inherently false without examining their basis. The Charlottesville example is presented with Trump's 'very fine people' quote while omitting that he also said neo-Nazis 'should be condemned totally,' stripping context from a disputed incident.
Selective OmissionContext StrippingNarrative FramingLoaded Language
“Trump stated during a press conference that while some people at the rally were 'very fine people,' those who were neo-Nazis and white nationalists should be 'condemned totally'”
“Members of the liberal media constantly called Trump 'racist'”
The article frames the reporter's question as an attempt to 'corner' the Trump team and celebrates Leavitt's response, presenting her reaction positively. It buries the substance of Trump's Jesse Jackson statement and omits context about the Obama video that preceded the question, instead framing the White House rapid response posting as a decisive win.
Loaded LanguageNarrative FramingSelective OmissionContext Stripping
“CBS Reporter Tries To Corner Trump Team — Karoline Leavitt Starts Rolling Tape”
“Fifteen minutes later, the White House Rapid Response X account pulled a video of Don Lemon”
This article highlights a genuine and significant contradiction — Leavitt's claim that Truth Social posts are official policy vs. the earlier staffer excuse for the Obama video — which is valuable context most outlets miss. However, it uses loaded language like 'startling admission' and 'blatantly racist post,' presenting contested characterizations as established facts.
Loaded LanguageNarrative FramingContext Stripping
“Leavitt made the startling admission during a press briefing”
“Just one week after administration officials blamed a staffer for a blatantly racist post”
The article frames the entire exchange in terms favorable to Trump and Leavitt, devoting significant space to Trump's full Jesse Jackson tribute and policy accomplishments list without critically evaluating those claims. A hyperlinked subheadline labeling a House Democrat a 'buffoon' reveals strong right-leaning framing throughout the piece.
Narrative FramingSelective OmissionLoaded Language
“WHITE HOUSE BLASTS TOP HOUSE DEMOCRAT AS A 'BUFFOON' AFTER JEFFRIES BRANDS STEPHEN MILLER A 'HATEFUL BIGOT'”
“he has absolutely been falsely called and smeared as a racist. And I'm happy to provide you those receipts”
This article presents the briefing exchange relatively straightforwardly but uses language that frames the reporter's question as inappropriately provocative ('play the race card') and describes Leavitt's response approvingly. It includes Leavitt's policy list without critically evaluating those claims.
Loaded LanguageSelective Omission
“calling out the reporters sitting before her in the White House briefing room for trying to play the race card against Mr. Trump”
“Ms. Leavitt also responded by saying that Mr. Trump had advanced opportunity and prosperity for all Americans through record tax cuts”
The article covers the racism exchange fairly but frames Leavitt's response as 'gobsmacked' and leads with audible chuckles in the briefing room, subtly signaling that the reporter's question was reasonable and Leavitt's reaction was excessive. It concludes by noting the debate is ongoing without providing specific context from either side.
Loaded LanguageNarrative Framing
“That spurred Leavitt's shocked response and led to a few audible chuckles in the briefing room”
“Trump's racial attitudes have long been the subject of hot debate”
This brief article covers Leavitt's comments on the DHS shutdown accurately, attributing blame squarely to Democrats in line with the White House framing without independently verifying or contextualizing those claims. Includes a notable 'Support trusted journalism' donation prompt mid-article that is editorially incongruous.
Narrative FramingSelective Omission
“Last night, they sent over a counter proposal that, frankly, was very unserious”
“Democrats are the reason that the Department of Homeland Security is currently shut down”
This article reports Leavitt's characterization of Democrats' DHS proposal accurately and includes her 'good faith negotiations' claim, but it uncritically adopts the White House framing of the shutdown as Democrats' fault. The 'breaking news' label for routine briefing coverage inflates the story's significance.
Loaded LanguageNarrative Framing
“Leavitt has branded the Democrats' latest counterproposal on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding as 'very unserious'”
“she said the White House and administration members had been engaged 'in good faith negotiations with the Democrats'”
This article provides the most comprehensive factual account of the Iran military buildup story, including specific naval assets, aircraft deployments, and statements from both US and Iranian officials. Minor center-left lean appears in framing Trump's warnings as 'veiled threats' and emphasizing escalation risk without equally presenting the US negotiating position.
Loaded LanguageNarrative Framing
“Her statement came as part of a series of veiled threats from officials under US President Donald Trump”
“The threats come as the US appears to be surging more military assets to the Middle East, raising the spectre of escalation”
This article provides the most detailed factual account of the DHS shutdown negotiations, including specific dates and contents of proposals from both sides. It balances Leavitt's White House framing with the note that Democrats' earlier offer included substantive policy requests, giving readers a clearer picture of the dispute.
Loaded Language
“Democrats sent the White House a 10-point plan on Feb. 4 that included calls to tighten warrant requirements, unmask agents engaging in field operations and end roving patrols”
“Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer referred to the White House offer as 'not serious'”
This is one of the most factually grounded and concise articles, reporting specific details about the Iran talks including the names of US negotiators, characterization of progress, and a potential timeline. It avoids loaded language and presents both the state of negotiations and the military context without sensationalizing.
“The negotiators 'made a little bit of progress' but are still 'very far apart on some issues'”
“I believe the Iranians are expected to come back to us with some more detail in the next couple of weeks”
This is a very brief, factual wire-style report on one specific element of the briefing — Trump's lack of direct talks with Democratic lawmakers on the DHS shutdown. It includes no loaded language or apparent framing choices, though its brevity omits context about the state of negotiations.
“the president 'hasn't had any direct conversations or correspondence with Democrat lawmakers recently'”
“Democrats are the reason that the Department of Homeland Security is currently shut down”
This brief wire report neutrally captures Leavitt's statement on Cuba without editorializing. It accurately notes she stopped short of calling for regime change and reports her exact language. No apparent framing bias.
“They are a regime that is falling. Their country is collapsing and that's why we believe it's in their best interest to make very dramatic changes very soon”
“she would not discuss any actions the U.S. may take to get there”
This is a one-sentence wire dispatch reporting a single fact from the briefing with no framing, interpretation, or loaded language. It is as neutral as reporting can be, though its extreme brevity provides no context whatsoever.
“U.S. President Donald Trump has had no direct talks with the Democratic lawmakers recently concerning a government shutdown”
