Heavily editorialized piece framing Clinton's comment as an 'incredible admission' that validates conservative positions. Explicitly questions her motives as political positioning rather than genuine belief. Uses loaded language throughout: 'skewering Biden,' 'radical position,' 'pretending they are somehow centrist.' Treats Clinton's enforcement criticism as illegitimate 'crack' rather than substantive concern. Editor's note solicits reader support for 'conservative reporting.'
“I'm not exactly sure why she's there or what she was hoping to achieve”
“So why is she saying this now? Is she trying to position herself as a moderate choice for 2028? Yeah, that's not going to happen.”


