Frames the story as being about "who wields power" between prosecutors and lawmakers, emphasizing jurisdictional questions over the substance of the investigation. Characterizes the standoff as "not a minor procedural debate" with "real political and constitutional weight," elevating the significance to match conservative concerns about executive overreach. Notably avoids defending Powell while focusing on process concerns. The framing subtly validates scrutiny of Powell ("renovation invoices") while criticizing the method.
“This is not a minor procedural debate. It is a fight over whether scrutiny of the Federal Reserve is framed as a criminal matter or as congressional oversight”
“He's billions of dollars over budget. So, either he's incompetent or he's crooked”


